Jesus Is Not on the Ballot

Ballot, Election, VoteThe evangelical community is struggling with a crisis of conscience over Donald Trump. What do you do with a man who promises Supreme Court justices who could end the serious evil of abortion, yet likely sexually assaulted several women? He is a blowhard narcissistic jerk, but he has an (R) in front of his name.

I won’t rehash the debate. Those who know me know how I feel. I want to speak to evangelicals about an idol they have cherished for generations. The Christian church has lost its voting majority for the first time in US history. There may be more people who say they are Christians voting than people who say they aren’t, but I am convinced that most voters are not looking carefully at scripture as they make their decision.

My own memory only extends into the 80s, but I remember the Moral Majority and how aggressively they attacked Bill Clinton. To be sure, President Clinton deserved the attacks. Christians at the time were somewhat cavalier about how much a politician needed to cater to us. Anyone who got on the wrong side of a the Moral Majority stood a good chance of being on the wrong side of an election.

This led to a dangerous cancer in American Christians. It led us to have faith in elections. As long as 51% of voters picked our candidate, peace an justice would rule the day. We traded in our God for a ballot box.

Today, that has changed, and I feel the fear among Christian. On the heels of the Supreme Court mandating gay marriage, we saw the great institutions that we had deified turning from saviors into demons. With our electoral majority gone, we looked for a savior. Instead we got Donald Trump.

Brothers an sisters, the scriptures are clear. It is not 51% of Americans who pick our leaders. It is God. He sometimes appoints evil leaders and sometimes good ones. Do not have faith in America, elections, presidents, or Supreme Court Justices. Have faith in God. Jesus did not die to Make America Great, he died to bring his bride home with him.

So have hope. Whoever is president, God is still on his throne. If we spent half the time hand wringing about the presidency actually praying for our leaders and country, much more good would be done. God was on the throne guiding the world when Nero and Hitler were in power. He can handle today.

Jesus is not on the ballot in November. He was already appointed to be King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Don’t have faith in elections. Have faith in Jesus.



Fifty Shades and BDSM: A Biblical Perspective

171976248_2e47577f6e_oWith the release of Fifty Shades of Grey this coming Friday, we can expect one of the largest audiences for a film of such risqué material in a very long time. Far from the sexually charged films of the past, this is a movie that will primarily draw women who will bring their (all too willing) boyfriends and husbands.

As a card-carrying member of conservative Christianity, I am fascinated as I see the church responding to Fifty Shades of Grey. It seems that most of the church is quietly ignoring the film, hoping it will go away. Another segment is quietly planning to see the film as a guilty pleasure. A final group is vocally calling the film out.

Let me be clear, Fifty Shades of Grey is high budget pornography. The film quality will be good, the artistic merit will be higher the most porn, and the harm will be that much greater because of it. A full twenty minutes of a one hundred minute film is sex scenes. To pretend this is anything but pornography is to practice an amazing level of self-deception.

Take it from an expert rationalizer.

In my own thinking about the film, I have seen some reaction from Christians that has not attacked the graphic nudity and blatant sexuality on a screen, but rather the bondage itself as evil. It made me wonder, is there a biblical case against BDSM (Bondage, Domination, SadoMasochism)?

While the topic of BDSM is  broad one and I couldn’t address every specific case (nor would I want to), from here on out, let me refer specifically to the bondage part of BDSM as it seems to be the most common sexual practice that falls under the term BDSM.

As I’ve considered the actual teachings from the Bible, I have noticed that the focus of the sexual morals in scripture are focused on who I have sex with (only my wife), when I have sex (only after marriage), but not how to have sex.

It seems that God has left the specific practices of sex to the consciences and preferences of the husband and wife. I find no case against use of ropes and candle wax and gags. While these practices are by and large distasteful to me, I would be unable to make a case that another husband and wife should not do them.

Then a caution arises. While the scriptures do not specifically say how to have sex, they have a lot to say about what our motivations and desires should be.

As a husband, I am going to speak to husbands now. Not to say these commands don’t apply to the ladies too, it’s just that I feel that the bulk of the sin here lies with us men. It is also my practice to police my own team first and guys, you are my team!

Your Body is Hers

The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 1 Cor 7:3-4

Far from saying her body is yours, the focus is on how you can serve her. This is not a weapon to force an unwilling spouse to uncomfortable sexual situations, this is a call to serve in the bedroom.

So be careful that when you might desire to use a little rope or blindfold, that your first priority is to serve her. What can you do to make her experience better? If these tools help her enjoy your sexual relationship more, then good. But be careful of your deceptive heart.

Submission in the Bible

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Eph 5:21-23

Yes, submission is in the Bible. Submit to one another. Far from forcing unwanted sexual experiences, we need to submit to each other. Gentlemen, we tend to get what we want in the bedroom (the ladies, not so much), let’s be careful to submit to our wive’s requests. Submission is the action taken by a serving heart.

Make sure your wife is safe

Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. Eph 5:25-28

The main point of this verse is that husbands should love their wives sacrificially because Jesus loves his church sacrificially. With that is the instruction to love you wife like you love your own body. Part of loving her is making sure that what you are doing sexually is safe. Many of the BDSM practices can injure and sometimes kill.

For example, there is a part of the BDSM community that uses asphyxiation (placing plastic bags over their head to heighten an orgasm). This can and has killed before. It is not loving to risk your wife’s safety.

Does it serve your wife spiritually

There are many women out there that have an unhealthy view of themselves as somehow deserving to be humiliated or shamed. These ladies might take part in bondage because they see it as fitting and not because they would naturally enjoy it. A thoughtful husband would not encourage a harmful view in his wife of herself.

When Jesus loves the church, he makes her feel special and deeply loved. Jesus washes away our insecurities by demonstrating that he will love us as we are. We aren’t loved because we are just that great, we are loved because he is that great.

If bondage hurts your wife spiritually or emotionally, then avoid it. It is far better that you demonstrate restraint for yourself to serve her.

Will it enslave you

“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be dominated by anything. 1 Cor 6:12

Just because something is enjoyable and not specifically banned by scripture does not make it good. Even if all of the conditions above are met, would bondage start to dominate you. Would you get to the point of being unable to enjoy sex without ropes? Would your wife become and object to be used and not a person to be loved? Would you enjoy sex and forget about the God who made sex to be enjoyed?

Of course, there are a million ways our heart enslave us. For some, these practices would be a delightful way to enjoy their spouse and that enjoyment is a great good. For others, it is another trap they need to avoid.

BDSM practices are never specifically mentioned in scripture and, in my opinion, should be used with caution. Those who say they are banned by the Bible have no case that I know of from scripture. Whatever you believe, be careful to love your God and love your wife. It is hard to go wrong by fighting hard to please your wife and your God and it is impossible to go right if you only want to please yourself.


The image above is courtesy of Zaphodsotherhead and is used with permission. Also, Zaphodsotherhead is such a wonderful Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy reference!


NGC_4414_(NASA-med)In a very far-away corner of the Universe, billions of light-year away. There is a galaxy. Light from this galaxy has never reached Earth, so there is no human name for it. As galaxies go, this one if quite unimpressive. A frumpy galaxy that probably was not popular in high school.

Circling this galaxy, on the end of one of its most unfashionable arms, is a lone, small star. Circling this star at a distance of about 15 light hours is a small clump of ice whose only distinguishing feature is its utter ordinariness. A small spike protrudes from the center and at the very tip, there is a water molecule.

The oxygen in this water molecule is a rather selfish habit of keeping the electrons to itself much of the time. As the electrons attempt to escape the powerful magnetic force the binds them to the nucleus, an even stronger force presses the neutrons and protons together. The glue that hold them together is also the force that created them. The quarks inside the protons attempt to leave, but the force holds them together with unimaginable strength.

Scrutinizing this amazing dance is a Creator who watches and waits. Every circle of the electron is watched and guided. Every rule in the depths of the atom is enforced by the God who make the atom. He watches and delights in the amazing symmetries. The particles try to run and to stay, to disappear and to create more, but he holds them firmly and shepherds them into their destiny.

He watches each atom in the whole ice crystal. He guides the slow 498.76 year orbit of the crystal from its distant star. He watches the star as it slowly marches through the frumpiest of galaxies. In fact, despite it’s frumpiness, He has a special affection for this galaxy that no human being will ever see or know of.

He takes a special delight in knowing things that he alone will ever know. It’s not that he is secretive, but that he does have his secrets. No one will ever know of his favorite boring star in the frumpiest of all galaxies because no one will ever think to ask. He chuckles as he considers this.

His intimate understanding extends through all the nearby galaxies. He knows every secret of every particle and wave in all the depths of all space. Every last one stands at attention to his command and every last one immediately obeys his instruction.

The immensity of his intellect and power make this intimate knowledge effortless. He could create a million such universes and know them just as well. He did not struggle to hold this together, he enjoyed holding it together. He loved knowing what he had made.

As he stares across the cosmos and feels the ebb and flow of hundreds of billions of galaxies, he has a special attention to a little planet and a moderately more fashionable region of the universe. This planet, green with life, is not his favorite, but the people who live on it are quite special to him.

One of his better kept secrets if why, exactly, he cares for these little creatures. He made them in his image and that is a remarkable thing, but many have wondered why he would do this. Even making them in his image, why does he love them so much. There are many more fantastic and remarkable things happening in the Universe at any second, yet he watches with a special attention for these ants on a little iron ball.

His explanations of why he loved them were never satisfactory to the questioner. This was another thing that made him chuckle. He could decide to love them and he had decided to. The questioner always seems to think there needs to be a better reason, but this is reason enough for a finite questioner with a finite questions.

He even finds it remarkable in his own thinking that he loves them. A testament to the type of God he is, one who loved children and not just clocks in a wound up Universe.

So let us, those very children, take a moment and realize that while he scrutinizes that atom in the depths of space, he is watching us: he is watching me. He is taking the time to love me and know me. He is the sort of God who wants to know me and be known by me. What sort of God is this?

Certainly a mysterious one.


When Michael Brown became a Symbol

FergusonEven as Michael Brown lay in a Ferguson street, a transformation was happening. Certainly he was changing from life to death, but something changed in those moments, not in him, but in us.

Michael Brown stopped being a person who was shot and transformed into a symbol. The metamorphosis was gradual, taking hours and days, but soon we were no longer looking at  a young man.

Officer Darren Wilson, the man who shot Michael, was also making the same change. He was becoming something much greater than himself. While Michael never lived to see himself become a symbol, Officer Wilson lives as a symbol to this day.

Even while the blood dried on the pavement, Michael represented another victim of hundred of years of oppression of black men; another recipient of a bullet from a system over-eager to shoot black men. He was the cry of an oppressed minority seeking justice.

To others he symbolized the failure of the family. Another stupid teenager who was out of control: another outcropping on a gang culture that breeds violence.

Officer Wilson also stopped being a person and became a symbol of the oppressor. A cowboy who just couldn’t wait to shoot a black man with the weakest of provocations. The hands of an oppressive state pressed him on and would protect him from any recriminations from those he wronged.

To others, he became a protector from an out of control gang war zone. The Officer Wilsons of the world were the last line of defence before hoodlums were breaking down doors. He represented a man’s right to defend himself with deadly force, if necessary.

The speed with which these symbols were generated was amazing. Partly to blame is the proximity to the Trayvon Martin case, which had similar symbolic overtones. The pain and anger felt by both whites and blacks were aggravated by the Trayvon Martin case and were now inflamed even more by another unarmed black teen shot to death.

What was amazing as well was how quickly the symbolism sped ahead of the facts of the case. Opinions were formed quickly and facts came out slowly. Most parties seemed invested in their understanding of what happened long before it was clear what actually happened. Wilson was a hero or a villain long before it was clear which one he really was.

But this is the nature of symbols. One of the great mistakes we make is to believe that the national debate that has proceeded has had anything to do with Michael Brown or Officer Wilson. They were names that were attached to a symbol that long preceded them. We had a narrative in mind before Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin and the narrative we planned was the narrative we would give, regardless of the facts.

The debate we are having has little, if anything, to do with Michael Brown. Whether he was completely innocent with his hands in the air or aggressively attacking Officer Wilson does not change that we have some serious racial tensions.

That, of course, is the real problem.

We don’t get to feel too special for having racial problems. They are ubiquitous to human culture. Britain has tensions with the Irish. Rwanda with the Tutsi. South African’s with the indigenous Africans. China with the Tibetans. Russia with, well, anyone who’s not Russian. Australia with the Aborigines.

Because the exact nature of the encounter between Michael Brown and Officer Wilson only symbolizes the existing racial tensions, we would be foolish to get hung up on the details of that encounter. Whoever is in the wrong, it does not fix the broader racial tension that exists.

So when we speak of the Michael Brown, we must be careful to realize that we are really talking about the sense oppression by African-Americans. When we speak of Officer Wilson, we must know that to most whites, he represents another victim of angry black teenagers.

So, when Officer Wilson was not charged with wrongdoing, the ensuing riots had little to do with him. He represented another one of those officers that beat Rodney King, another George Zimmerman, another case of the system protecting a racial predator. The wound in the nation is symbolized by him, but it is not him.

The riots themselves have taken on symbolism. To the minority communities, they show how deeply they feel oppressed and abused. To the white majority, it is yet another example of lawlessness and anger among minorities.

The point is that when we talk to each other about these cases, let’s not get too hung up on the facts. Let’s have the more important discussion about why we want to believe one set of facts or the other. Why is Officer Wilson’s guilt or innocence important to you? Why is it important to me?

Most of us had a narrative that we quickly placed these events inside. That narrative drives the anger and resentment. Any discussion that ignores that narrative, that symbolism, misses the point entirely.

Finally, listen, really listen to the other’s narrative. It is important for the majority whites to recognize that we simply don’t understand what it feels like to be part of a minority. We need to listen to their narrative. Really listen. There is a deep and painful story to be heard that goes back centuries.

For the African-American community, it is quite painful to have a presumption of racism placed on me simply because I am a white man from the South. Much of my own reaction comes from the narrative that assumes I am a racist simply because I am a white man. Many white men feel like I do. We don’t talk about race because we always come away judged no matter how thoughtful we are. Please, we want to engage with you in these discussions. Please listen to our narrative.

When God made human being, he made them all in His image. The chorus of Heaven will not have pale skin. The ethnicity of Heaven will have every tribe, tongue, and nation. One of the great delights of Heaven will be seamless racial harmony. When we listen well to each other now, we taste a bit of what that will be like.

I can’t wait.


The image above is courtesy of Jamelle Bouie and is used with permission

Lessons from the Ebola Conference


As many of you know, I recently went to the CDC’s Ebola Safety Training that was held at the Center for Domestic Preparedness in Aniston, AL. I was expecting a good experience, but it surpassed my expectations. The practice we received was excellent.

Part of our days were spent in lectures to fills us in on the most up-to-date information about Ebola in this outbreak. Some of this was humorous (we can’t have a whole conference and never laugh), some was sobering, and most was quite enlightening.

I wanted to share with you some of the better quotes from the conference.

“If you find a chimpanzee dead in the jungle, don’t eat it

I can’t say I’ve ever been tempted to eat a chimpanzee even if it were already dead. But, if I were staring in the jungle and food was lying right there, I would be tempted. Unfortunately, Ebola kills chimpanzees just as well as it kills humans. Some of the outbreaks in the past have been started with a dead chimpanzee found in the jungle.

In fact, don’t even touch it.

“Your hands can kill you”

We touch our faces a lot. Ebola and most infectious illnesses need to come into your body through your mouth, nose, or eyes. The dirtiest part of your body, your hands, need to keep away from your face when working with Ebola.

This require a surprising amount of discipline. As I am typing this, I rubbed my right eye without thinking. It is such a constant part of our lives to touch our faces. When working with Ebola, this needs to stop.

This is most important in the Ebola Treatment Unit. With every surface as a possible place for Ebola to hide, we are not to adjust our goggles or fix our respirator. If we must fix something, we need to doff out of the unit to do it safely.

“Ebola is the Anti-Compassion Disease”

Everything we do that shows compassion or care for someone is forbidden by Ebola. We can’t hug them, care for them, feed them without taking a serious risk. All human contact is cut off by this ruthless menace.

Imagine for a moment that everyone who cared for you was wearing a giant orange suit. The only skin you can see if their eyes in the goggles. When I was practicing in the ETU, I couldn’t recognize my classmates. Ebola even denies you the compassionate looks of those caring for you.

The worst case of all for this was the very real case of when a pregnant woman comes into an ETU with Ebola. The outcome for her and her baby is not good. She will almost certainly spontaneously abort the baby and then she will almost certainly die.

So the question arose, how should we handle such a case? Compassion drives us to hold her hand through labor and help deliver the baby. Caution warns us that there are a LOT of body fluids involved in delivery and we would be under a tremendous risk of being exposed to Ebola. There are no easy answers.

Ebola is the anti-compassion disease.

“Your first responsibility is to keep yourself safe.”

As health care workers, we generally think of the patient first in priority. Not so with Ebola. Our safety take preeminence. If I should get Ebola, the first casualty will be the reputation of the Ebola unit in the community. Credibility is a precious thing in these settings. Many will wonder at us if we can’t keep ourselves safe.

The second casualty will be the negative press worldwide which will discourage others from going into these places to help. Additionally, the huge resources that will be needed to send us to our home country will further burden stretched resources.

The third casualty could be me. While no American health care staff have died of Ebola, it is a dangerous illness. I could die. I could spread it to others.

So, the most important thing is that I keep myself safe. My second priority is to keep my team safe. My third priority is to care for the patients.

“Ebola can be beaten”

While Ebola is a challenging disease, it is not the scariest disease humanity has faced. With several vaccines in the works and a number of possibly effective drug, this may be the first and last great Ebola outbreak. Those drug and vaccines are months to years away, but once we have them in our arsenal, we should have the upper hand.

Even without them, we can take on Ebola now. If the success of the ETUs in Liberia has taught us anything, it is that with a concerted effort, Ebola can be pushed back. We need to keep up those efforts.



Life in Fort McClellan

1280px-CDP_7-28-07_Smaller[1]Today is the first day of my training for Ebola care in a tropical setting. I arrived last night at the Center for Domestic Preparedness in Anniston, AL. I was surprised to learn that this is the site of the now close Fort McClellan. It closed in 1999 and changed into a training facility for various disasters. Among the cooler things that are kept here is active ricin and Anthrax. They actually work with the real stuff. Fortunately, the Ebola students don’t have to work with anything so deadly.

The accommodations here are very nice. Every meal is all you can eat and delicious. The old mess hall has been converted into a regular restaurant. As pleasant as the food is, the company is even better. I’ve spoken with the heads of disaster preparedness for hospitals, overseas doctors and nurses, and everyone in between.

We are staying in the equivalent of a private hotel room. I share a bathroom with the room next to mine, but otherwise you wouldn’t know it was different from a hotel, complete with an ice machine at the bottom of the stairs.

The only caveat to all this is that they do believe in a military schedule. Classes get going at 7:30 AM and the place really gets going at 5:30 AM. Classes run until 5:30 PM, so lots to learn in these next few days.

One of the funniest things for me has been watching the local news this morning. They are lamenting the ‘Cold Front’ and ‘Cold Conditions’ this morning. It was 39 degrees. I hesitate to mention that where I came from, 10 plus inches of snow are supposed to fall today.

Well, time to head off to my first classes. I expect to bake quite nicely in the full Ebola attire.


Would an Ebola Quarantine Work?

quarantineThere has been a lot of buzz about the possibility of quarantines of health care staff. It is time that someone explained how a quarantine works and discussed whether it makes sense in this setting.

What is a Quarantine?

An important distinction needs to be made between quarantine and isolation. Isolation is to take people who are infectious and isolate them to prevent them from spreading the disease. Isolation can be mandatory or voluntary. Historically, Ebola has had mandatory isolation but for the most part, patients and families were willingly isolated to prevent the spread of the disease to others. Isolation is very good practice for a disease like Ebola.

A quarantine is more aggressive. Quarantines are where a population of healthy people are isolated because they might become infectious. They are usually involuntary because no one wants to be locked in with infectious people. It is usually accompanied by aggressive state actions to enfoce the quarantine.

When would a Quarantine make sense?

The justification for a quarantine requires two elements. First, the illness must be infectious. It would make no sense to quarantine cancer patients because they can’t transmit their disease. In the epidemiology community, the measure of infectivity is the Basic Reproduction Number or R-Naught (written as R0). It is the number of people you would expect, on average, to get an illness from an infectious person. Influenza has an R0 of 2-3, smallpox 5-7, measles is 12-18. The 2014 Ebola outbreak has an R0 of about 1.7 in West Africa. In the US, it is much lower with only two transmissions from the seven patients who have been treated.

The second factor is the severity of the illness.  Ebola, of course, is one of the deadlier illnesses out there, so its severity is certainly enough that isolation and quarantine are worth considering.

Both factors are important. Rabies and Mad Cow disease, which are nearly %100 fatal, do not require a quarantine because they are relatively difficult to transmit. Chicken Pox may be very infectious, but it is not so severe that we should consider isolation and quarantine. We would live in quite an oppressive society is the common cold was justification for isolation just because it was infectious despite the fact it is fairly benign as an illness.

What are the Advantages of a Quarantine?

At least in theory, quarantining an illness should isolate it to a small group of people where it can be safely treated or allowed to fizzle out on its own. To separate the potentially sick from the healthy does protect the healthy and may minimize the spread of the illness.

Another major advantage of quarantines is that they are a simple solution that makes the healthy feel safer. Quarantines are usually done by the healthy to the potentially sick. It allows the local leaders to say they did something which pacifies a frightened public.

One of the most justifiable and terrible quarantines in history is Typhoid Mary, who was an symptom free carrier of Typhoid. She was quarantined for 26 years of her life to protect the public from the outbreaks of typhoid that followed her. She was essentially imprisoned for life because of a disease she had.

What are the Disadvantages of a Quarantine?

Quarantines are not particularly effective. The only moderately effective quarantine I can find is management of Mad Cow Disease. It involved slaughtering 4.5 million head of cattle, which was the only effective solution because Mad Cow is universally fatal and untreatable.

Of course, this is not an option for humans. Quarantines have been rare in modern times. In 2007, a man named James Speaker was quarantined with extensively drug resistant tuberculosis. The last American quarantine before him was in 1963.

Quarantines can pacify a large segment of the population, but they often enrage the quarantined. During a smallpox outbreak in 1983, Local authorities attempted to quarantine the municipality of Muncie, Indiana. The population did not believe they had smallpox and several local officials were shot. Not only was the quarantine unenforceable, it created more problems than it solved.

Another difficulty of quarantines has been how often they are thinly veiled racial oppression. When a majority views a minority as dirty or disease ridden, it lowers the threshold necessary to quarantine them as a group. In 1900, California quarantined a section of San Francisco which was almost exclusively made of Chinese immigrants and their businesses. The effects were devastating to the local businesses and the quarantine was later thrown out by a federal court.

Does a Quarantine make sense for Ebola in America?

Ebola is certainly a dangerous illness with a 70% fatality rate in West Africa. A quarantine was tried in Liberia and Sierra Leone and both seem to have had no benefit and generally only aggravated an already tense public.

Ebola also is quite contagious to those performing funerals and direct caregivers of the sick. So the basic criteria for a quarantine are met in West Africa. Despite this, the quarantines that have been tried were failures. The energy and resources placed in the quarantine would have been much better spent on caring for the sick.

So would and Ebola quarantine in America make sense? The severity of Ebola in a modern health care setting has been much better than in Africa. There has been one death of Ebola in the US with this outbreak of the seven who have been treated. The death of Thomas Duncan was not surprising because even when he came for treatment in Dallas, he was sent home for several days. Despite this, Duncan only gave Ebola to the people you would expect him to transmit to, direct caregivers.

In fact, despite a botched handling of that outbreak, no one in the community developed Ebola. This is consistent with European treatment of Ebola patients where only direct caregivers of the sick have gotten Ebola.

So Ebola is not as severe nor as transmittable in a Western setting. This is not surprising as the toilet may be a greater safeguard than anything else. To take those infected body fluids away and have then adequately treated is probably more important than all of the personal protective equipment on the planet.

Taking all of this into consideration, I think a quarantine of health care workers or civilians who are not sick (which is to say, not contagious) would be neither effective nor beneficial. It is a political band-aid for a non-existent problem. In the history of this outbreak, no one has caught Ebola from a Western health care worker and no one has caught Ebola on a plane. There is simply no evidence to justify a quarantine.

But if even one person would get Ebola, wouldn’t a quarantine be justified?

This is an objection I have found is pretty common. As long as the life of a West African carries as much weight as an American, then this makes no sense. The small risk of an American getting Ebola much be weighted against the hundreds and thousands of lives that traveling health care staff going to West Africa can save. It only makes sense to say this if their lives don’t count. And their lives count!

Isn’t it selfish of those health care workers to risk the public by not quarantining themselves?

No more risk than when you get behind the wheel of your car. 34,000 Americans die in car accidents every year, so far one has died of Ebola ever. When you stop driving for public health reasons, get back to me.

As I have argued before, the burden on the health care workers who go overseas is heavy and to make it heavier only discourages us from going, which is a loss for everyone.

In conclusion

Let me end by asking that we, who want to go to West Africa, not be hindered. Care enough for the dying in West Africa to allow us to go and do what we are good at. It is no risk to you and a very great risk for them. Love them enough to overcome your fear.

And even if you are afraid, know that quarantines don’t really work that well. Find a better solution before you shackle us with a quarantine.